StatPing.ng

Open-source uptime monitoring and status pages, honestly reviewed. No marketing fluff, just what you get when you self-host it.

TL;DR

• What it is: Open-source (GPL-3.0) all-in-one status page + uptime monitor — it watches your HTTP, TCP, UDP, ICMP, and gRPC endpoints and publishes the results to a public-facing status page, in one tool [README].
• Who it’s for: Sysadmins, indie hackers, and self-hosters who want a single binary that handles both monitoring and status communication, without stitching together two separate products [1][2].
• Cost savings: Atlassian’s Statuspage starts at $29/mo for the Hobby tier and jumps to $399/mo for the Business tier [5]. StatPing.ng is free software — your only cost is the VPS it runs on.
• Key strength: All-in-one: the monitoring agent and the status page are the same process. No separate Prometheus, no separate Grafana, no webhook glue. You get uptime graphs, service history, and a public status page out of a single Docker container [2][README].
• Key weakness: The UI feels noticeably dated compared to newer alternatives, and the project is a community-maintained fork of an abandoned original — so long-term maintenance is a real question mark [1].

---

What is StatPing.ng

StatPing.ng is a status page and monitoring server built in Go. The “ng” matters: the original statping project stopped active development, and StatPing.ng is the community fork that picked up the work [README]. The GitHub description is direct: “An updated drop-in replacement of statping after development stopped on the original fork.”

The core pitch is simplicity through consolidation. Most monitoring stacks separate the concerns: Prometheus collects metrics, Grafana visualizes them, and a separate tool like Cachet or Statuspage publishes a user-facing status page. StatPing.ng collapses all three into one. It polls your services, stores the results in SQLite, MySQL, or PostgreSQL, draws uptime graphs, and serves a public status page — all from the same process.

Because it’s written in Go, the compiled binary has no external runtime dependencies. You can drop it on a Linux VPS, a Raspberry Pi, a Windows server, or a Mac without installing Node, Python, or a JVM [README]. The Docker image is small, and docker-compose deployment is the recommended path for most self-hosters.

The project supports monitoring via HTTP, TCP, UDP, ICMP (ping), and gRPC — which is broader protocol coverage than most status-page-only tools offer [README][website]. Custom Sass theming lets you match the status page to your brand. Service groups organize endpoints into logical clusters. A REST API exposes everything for programmatic access. Notifiers cover Slack, Discord, Telegram, webhooks, email, and mobile push alerts.

At 1,937 GitHub stars, it’s not a high-momentum project. Compare that to Uptime Kuma’s 60,000+ or OpenStatus’s growing user base. But GitHub star counts measure popularity, not utility — and for its specific niche (all-in-one, self-hosted, Go binary), StatPing.ng occupies a real slot.

---

Why People Choose It

The reviews that mention StatPing.ng tend to position it the same way: reliable but showing its age, and best suited for people who want something that simply works rather than something that looks impressive.

The all-in-one argument. The clearest reason to choose StatPing.ng over competitors is that it doesn’t require you to assemble a stack. The OpenSource For You hands-on walkthrough [2] makes this tangible: spin up the Docker container, hit the setup page in your browser, configure your services from a tabbed UI, and you immediately get both active monitoring and a public status page. No separate exporter. No separate dashboard. No webhook from your monitoring tool into your status page tool.

The binary deployment argument. Go produces a statically linked binary. On platforms where you don’t want or can’t run Docker — an old Raspberry Pi, a shared hosting environment, a corporate Linux box without container runtimes — you download the appropriate binary and run it [README]. This is a real advantage over tools that require Node.js or Python runtimes.

The “functional over fancy” crowd. The OpenStatus comparative review [1] categorizes StatPing.ng as “Function Over Form” and explicitly recommends it for “hackers and sysadmins who just need it to work.” If you’re running a homelab, monitoring an internal suite of services, and a polished UI isn’t a priority — StatPing.ng doesn’t get in your way.

Protocol breadth. HTTP monitoring is table stakes. gRPC monitoring is not. For teams running gRPC microservices or non-HTTP services (TCP databases, UDP-based infrastructure), StatPing.ng’s protocol coverage is broader than many alternatives [README][website].

The Statuspage.io escape math. Atlassian’s Statuspage charges $29/month for the Hobby tier (restricted features, no custom domain CSS without upgrading) and $399/month for the Business tier with full customization [5]. StatPing.ng self-hosted on a $5 VPS costs $5/month — for unlimited services, unlimited checks, and full theming control. Over a year, that’s a potential $4,700 saved against the Business tier.

---

Features

Monitoring protocols:

• HTTP and HTTPS with configurable intervals and timeouts [README]
• TCP port monitoring [README][website]
• UDP monitoring [README][website]
• ICMP (ping) monitoring [website]
• gRPC service health checks [README][website]

Status page:

• Auto-generated public status page with uptime graphs and response time history [README][2]
• Service grouping — organize endpoints by team, region, or service type [website]
• Custom Sass theming — change colors, fonts, and layout to match your brand [website][2]
• Incident and maintenance announcements [2]

Alerting and notifications:

• Slack, Discord, Telegram, email (SMTP), webhooks [website][README]
• Mobile push alerts [website]
• Per-service notification routing

Data and storage:

• SQLite (zero-configuration, good for single-node installs) [README]
• MySQL and PostgreSQL for production deployments [README]
• Backup and restore of all services, groups, notifiers, and settings to/from a JSON file [2]

Developer features:

• REST API covering all resources [README]
• Plugin system [README]
• CLI tool [website]

Deployment options:

• Pre-compiled binaries for Linux, Windows, Mac, and Raspberry Pi [README]
• Docker image (adamboutcher/statping-ng) [README]
• Docker Compose with PostgreSQL [2][4]

Mobile app: The README and website reference a mobile app, though documentation on it is thin — treat this as a bonus rather than a primary feature.

---

Pricing: SaaS vs Self-Hosted Math

StatPing.ng has no SaaS offering and no commercial tier. It’s self-hosted or nothing, which is either a strength (zero subscription cost) or a problem (you do all the ops).

StatPing.ng self-hosted:

• Software license: $0 (GPL-3.0)
• VPS to run it: $5–10/mo on Hetzner, Contabo, or DigitalOcean
• Your time to set it up

What you’d pay otherwise:

Atlassian Statuspage [5]:

• Hobby: $29/mo (custom domain requires upgrade, limited CSS)
• Starter: $79/mo
• Business: $399/mo (full customization, private pages, custom CSS)

Hyperping [5]:

• Starts at $24/mo flat-rate (monitoring + status page + on-call)

Better Stack [5]:

• $29/user/mo + $21/mo per 50 monitors + $12/mo per status page (adds up fast)

Instatus [5]:

• $15/mo for the Pro tier

Concrete math: Say you’re a solo founder or small team currently on Statuspage.io Starter at $79/mo. Over a year that’s $948. StatPing.ng on a $6 Hetzner VPS is $72/year. The delta is roughly $876/year saved — and that’s against the middle tier, not the Business tier.

The GPL-3.0 license is free for self-hosting. It becomes relevant only if you want to embed StatPing.ng in a commercial product you sell — the GPL copyleft would require you to open-source your derivative. For self-hosting your own infrastructure, it’s effectively the same as MIT in practice.

---

Deployment Reality Check

The OpenSource For You tutorial [2] walks through a full Docker deployment and makes it look approachable. The AJ’s Blog post [4] shows a more production-grade setup with Ansible, PostgreSQL, nginx, and Let’s Encrypt on an AWS EC2 instance. Both confirm that StatPing.ng isn’t painful to deploy — but they also reveal what you’re actually signing up for.

What you need:

• A Linux VPS (1GB RAM is probably enough for a personal install; 2GB for anything serving real traffic)
• Docker and docker-compose, or the willingness to download and run a Go binary directly
• A domain name if you want HTTPS
• A reverse proxy (nginx or Caddy) for TLS termination
• A decision on database: SQLite works for small deployments; PostgreSQL is the right choice if you’re serious about reliability [4][README]
• An SMTP provider if you want email alerts

What the OpenSource For You tutorial [2] actually shows: The docker-compose setup is straightforward. The initial setup page is a web form — name, description, admin credentials — and you’re immediately dropped into a working status page pre-populated with demo probes. The admin dashboard is tab-driven and requires zero configuration file editing. Backup and restore is a JSON export/import via the UI. That’s genuinely friendly for a self-hosted tool.

What can go sideways:

• The project is a community fork of abandoned software. The original statping stalled; statping-ng exists because volunteers kept it alive. The GitHub CI badges show active builds, but the contributor base is small. If a breaking Go version change or a new gRPC spec comes along, you’re dependent on a handful of community maintainers [README].
• The AJ’s Blog deployment [4] uses Ansible with several external roles (jwilder/nginx-proxy, jrcs/letsencrypt-nginx-proxy-companion) — if you don’t know Ansible, that’s a separate learning curve from StatPing.ng itself.
• Data not available on specific known bugs or instability reports from the third-party sources reviewed here — but the OpenStatus review [1] flags the dated UX as a signal that the project isn’t actively investing in developer experience.

Realistic time estimate: 30–45 minutes to a working SQLite-backed instance behind a reverse proxy for someone comfortable with Docker. 2–4 hours if you’re also setting up PostgreSQL, SMTP, and Ansible provisioning from scratch.

---

Pros and Cons

Pros

• All-in-one monitoring + status page. You don’t need a separate alerting tool, a separate metrics store, and a separate status page. One container does all three [2][README].
• Zero runtime dependencies. Go binary, no Node, no Python, no JVM. Runs on Raspberry Pi [README].
• Broad protocol support. HTTP, TCP, UDP, ICMP, gRPC — not just web services [README][website].
• Multiple database backends. SQLite for simplicity, MySQL or PostgreSQL for production — your choice [README].
• REST API. Programmatic access to all resources. Useful for automating service registration or building integrations [README].
• Backup/restore to JSON. Not something every self-hosted tool offers; makes migrations manageable [2].
• Sass theming. Real customization, not just a logo upload [website][2].
• Notifier breadth. Slack, Discord, Telegram, SMTP, webhooks, mobile — most common channels covered [website].
• Free software. GPL-3.0, zero licensing cost for self-hosting [README].

Cons

• Outdated UI. Every review that mentions the interface says the same thing: it feels behind the times [1]. The OpenStatus comparison explicitly labels it “UI/UX feels stuck in the past.” If your status page is customer-facing, this matters — first impressions count.
• Community fork of abandoned software. The original statping stopped development. StatPing.ng is the fork, but it’s not backed by a company or a well-funded open-source organization. Long-term maintenance is a real concern [README].
• Small community. 1,937 stars versus Uptime Kuma’s 60,000+ means a smaller pool of people writing guides, building plugins, and filing bug reports. When something breaks, your support options are the wiki and GitHub issues.
• No hosted option. If you want StatPing.ng, you self-host it. There is no managed tier for teams that want the features without the ops burden.
• GPL-3.0 copyleft. Not an issue for self-hosting, but if you want to embed this in a commercial product or service, you’ll need to open-source your derivative work. MIT or Apache 2.0 it is not.
• Thin documentation. The wiki exists but community walkthroughs [2][4] do more work explaining the tool than the official docs do.

---

Who Should Use This / Who Shouldn’t

Use StatPing.ng if:

• You’re running a homelab or small production infrastructure and want one tool that monitors services and shows a status page, not two separate tools you have to wire together.
• You’re monitoring non-HTTP services — TCP, UDP, ICMP, gRPC — where most status-page-only tools stop working.
• You’re paying Atlassian $79–$399/month for Statuspage and the only thing standing between you and switching is setup effort.
• You’re deploying on hardware or environments where Docker isn’t available — a Go binary that runs everywhere is a real advantage.
• You’ve used the original statping and want the actively maintained fork.

Skip it (consider Uptime Kuma instead) if:

• You care about UI polish. Uptime Kuma has a modern interface and a vastly larger community (60,000+ stars vs. 1,937). If your status page is customer-facing and aesthetics matter, Uptime Kuma wins on looks [1][5].
• You want active development guarantees. Uptime Kuma has a large, active contributor base.

Skip it (consider OpenStatus instead) if:

• You want a modern, actively maintained project with both self-hosted and managed cloud options [1].
• You’re building a developer-facing product and the status page is part of your brand.

Skip it (consider OneUptime instead) if:

• You need more than monitoring and a status page — incident management, on-call scheduling, logs, and traces in one platform [3].

Skip it (stay on Statuspage.io) if:

• You’re inside the Atlassian ecosystem (Jira, Opsgenie) and need native integrations.
• Your compliance team won’t approve self-hosted infrastructure.
• You have fewer than 5 services and the $29/mo Hobby tier covers your needs.

---

Alternatives Worth Considering

• Uptime Kuma — the natural comparison. More stars (60,000+), more active development, cleaner modern UI. Also self-hosted only. If UI matters to you, Uptime Kuma wins. If protocol breadth and the backup/restore feature matter, StatPing.ng is more complete [5].
• OpenStatus — modern, actively maintained, self-hosted and cloud options, built-in Slack agent [1]. Better choice if you want a project with real momentum.
• Cachet — status-page only, no built-in monitoring. In a “transitional phase” waiting for v3.0 as of early 2026 [1]. Historically significant but not the right choice for new deployments right now.
• Vigil — written in Rust, designed for microservice architectures, extremely lightweight. Self-hosted only. Better choice if you’re monitoring microservices and want a minimal resource footprint [1].
• Atlassian Statuspage — the incumbent SaaS. Best Atlassian integration, highest price. $29/mo minimum, $399/mo for full features [5].
• Hyperping — flat-rate SaaS at $24/mo with monitoring, status pages, and on-call built in [5]. Pay $24/mo and own none of the ops overhead.
• OneUptime — MIT-licensed, all-in-one observability (uptime, status pages, incident management, logs, traces). MIT license is more permissive than StatPing.ng’s GPL-3.0 [3].

The realistic shortlist for a non-technical founder escaping Statuspage.io costs: Uptime Kuma (most popular, cleanest UI, largest community) vs. StatPing.ng (broader protocol support, all-in-one with backup/restore, binary deployment). Pick Uptime Kuma if UI and community matter. Pick StatPing.ng if you need gRPC monitoring or protocol breadth, or if you’re already familiar with the statping lineage.

---

Bottom Line

StatPing.ng is an honest, no-nonsense tool. It monitors your services across every major protocol and turns those results into a public status page, without requiring you to integrate two separate products. The Go binary is genuinely easy to deploy, the database flexibility is welcome, and the REST API means you’re not locked into the web UI. The price is right — $0 for the software, plus whatever your VPS costs.

The catches are real: the UI is dated, the project is a community fork of abandoned software rather than a product backed by a company or a large open-source foundation, and the community is small relative to alternatives like Uptime Kuma. If you’re choosing a status page tool for a customer-facing SaaS product, StatPing.ng’s aesthetics will work against you. If you’re a sysadmin monitoring internal infrastructure, running a homelab, or escaping a SaaS bill on a tight budget and don’t mind a utilitarian interface — it gets the job done reliably.

If the deployment is the blocker, that’s exactly what upready.dev deploys for clients. One-time fee, done, you own the infrastructure.

---

Sources

1. OpenStatus — “Best Open Source Status Page Tools in 2026” (Jan 19, 2026). https://www.openstatus.dev/guides/best-opensource-status-page-2026
2. Open Source For You — “Setting Up A Status Page To Monitor Cloud Infrastructure” (May 2025). https://www.opensourceforu.com/2025/05/setting-up-a-status-page-to-monitor-cloud-infrastructure/
3. OneUptime — “Best Open Source Monitoring Tools in 2026: The Complete Guide” (Feb 6, 2026). https://oneuptime.com/blog/post/2026-02-06-best-open-source-monitoring-tools-2026/view
4. AJ’s Blog — “Configuring a status page in the cloud with Statping”. https://blog.ayjc.net/posts/statping/
5. Hyperping — “Top 5 Statuspage Alternatives (2026 Guide)” (Feb 24, 2026, updated Apr 1, 2026). https://hyperping.com/blog/best-statuspage-alternatives

Primary sources:

• GitHub repository and README: https://github.com/statping-ng/statping-ng (1,937 stars, GPL-3.0 license)
• Official website: https://statping-ng.github.io
• Docker Hub: https://hub.docker.com/r/adamboutcher/statping-ng