Best Self-Hosted SolarWinds Alternatives in 2026
SolarWinds is an IT management platform for network, server, and application monitoring with alerting and reporting.
5 Self-Hosted Alternatives to SolarWinds
Netdata
78KReal-time infrastructure monitoring with per-second metrics, 800+ integrations, built-in ML anomaly detection, and AI troubleshooting — using just 5% CPU and 150MB RAM.
Netbox
20KNetbox is a self-hosted server monitoring replacement for Device42, Infoblox, and more.
OpenObserve
18KFast, scalable and cost-effective open source observability platform
Checkmk
2.2KCheckmk is a self-hosted server monitoring tool that monitors your entire IT infrastructure.
Icinga
2.2KReleased under GPL-3.0, Icinga monitors networks on self-hosted infrastructure.
Why Look for SolarWinds Alternatives?
SolarWinds is an IT management platform for network, server, and application monitoring with alerting and reporting.
Pricing
Here’s what SolarWinds charges for its plans:
Dameware Remote Everywhere --- $972/month
Dameware Mini Remote Control --- $370/month
Self-hosted alternatives eliminate these recurring costs entirely. You pay only for your own infrastructure.
5 Best Open-Source Alternatives to SolarWinds
Netdata
High-resolution metrics, real-time visualizations, and affordable monitoring. — 78,075 GitHub stars. Licensed under GPL-3.0.
OpenObserve
Monitor logs, metrics, and traces with an open-source observability platform. Achieve petabyte scale with 140x lower storage costs and high performance. — 18,149 GitHub stars. Licensed under AGPL-3.0.
Checkmk
Monitor your entire IT infrastructure with 2,000+ plugins, automated discovery, and scalable architecture. Open source and enterprise solutions available. — 2,222 GitHub stars. Licensed under GPL-2.0.
Icinga
Monitor networks, servers, and cloud environments with flexible open-source solution. Custom checks, fast alerts, and complete infrastructure control. — 2,180 GitHub stars. Licensed under GPL-3.0.
Netbox
The premier source of truth for network automation. — 20,004 GitHub stars. Licensed under Apache-2.0.
Why Self-Host Instead of SolarWinds?
- Data ownership. Your data stays on your server, not on SolarWinds’s infrastructure.
- Predictable costs. Pay a fixed VPS cost instead of growing per-user or per-usage fees.
- No vendor lock-in. Export and migrate your data anytime. You control the database.
- GDPR and compliance. Hosting your own tools simplifies data residency and compliance requirements.
Why teams switch from SolarWinds
- → Data ownership. Your data stays on your server -- not on SolarWinds's infrastructure.
- → Predictable costs. Pay a fixed VPS cost instead of growing per-user or per-usage fees.
- → No vendor lock-in. Export and migrate your data anytime. You control the database.
- → GDPR and compliance. Hosting your own tools simplifies data residency and compliance requirements.
Head-to-Head Comparisons
Both are monitoring tools. Checkmate has 7 unique features, Netdata has 3.
Both are monitoring tools. Coroot has 3 unique features, Netdata has 5.
Both are monitoring tools. Flipt has 8 unique features, Netdata has 2.
Both are monitoring tools. Gatus has 11 unique features, Netdata has 1.
Both are monitoring tools. Glances has 9 unique features, Netdata has 3.
Grafana is the better choice for teams with existing metrics infrastructure (Prometheus, InfluxDB) who need custom dashboards. Netdata is better for instant monitoring with zero configuration -- install and get real-time insights immediately.
Both are monitoring tools. Keep has 6 unique features, Netdata has 2.
Both are monitoring tools. Kite has 3 unique features, Netdata has 5.
Both are monitoring tools. Loki has 3 unique features, Netdata has 5.
Both are monitoring tools. Lunalytics has 4 unique features, Netdata has 3.
Both are monitoring tools. Netdata has 5 unique features, OneUptime has 3.
Both are monitoring tools. Netdata has 4 unique features, Parseable has 4.
Both are monitoring tools. Netdata has 3 unique features, PatchMon has 4.
Both are monitoring tools. Netdata has 3 unique features, Peekaping has 7.
Both are monitoring tools. Netdata has 5 unique features, Signoz has 3.
Both are monitoring tools. Netdata has 4 unique features, StatusScout has 6.
Both are monitoring tools. Netdata has 4 unique features, Uptrace has 4.
Both are monitoring tools. Netdata has 3 unique features, WatchYourLAN has 4.
Both Uptime Kuma and Netdata are strong open-source options in the monitoring space. Uptime Kuma has 84k GitHub stars and Netdata has 78k. Compare their features, deployment, and community to choose the right fit for your needs.
Browse more Monitoring & Observability tools
Explore 92 open-source monitoring & observability tools you can self-host.
View Monitoring & Observability →